Would ESEF mean easier financial analysis and better comparability?
Following on from our previous blog on ESEF’s comparability issues with the anchoring and extension...
Learn morePlease use Chrome for a better browsing experience as Internet Explorer is not supported
Download ChromeThe ESEF Reporting Manual is a document produced by the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA) to help issuers and software developers to create ESEF documents that are compliant with the ESEF Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS).
This week, ESMA released an updated version of the Reporting Manual to replace the previous version released in July 2020. I have summarised some of the new additions and changes that relate to issuers/preparers for the upcoming year.
ESMA has added a new sub-section giving information regarding annual reports that are produced in two (or more) different languages. If there is a requirement to submit more than one copy of the annual report to a regulator then they should be submitted as separate zip folders. All extensions elements created in one file should be consistent across all reports, regardless if there is a change in language. This includes element properties (duration, balances, signage), not just element names.
While ESEF requires all main market listed companies to prepare their annual reports in xHTML format, only those who prepare consolidated financial statements using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), need to be tagged. In this new update, ESMA has given more information relating to ESEF reports not subject to tagging, which was previously lacking.
This requirement means investment entities that fall under the consolidation exception (IFRS 10) do not need to tag their financial statements. They will however need to submit the ESEF filing in xHTML format.
For filers submitting their non-tagged xHTML documents, ESMA has introduced a new naming convention to follow (assuming there are no specific OAM requirements for naming conventions).
One of the more debated topics within previous ESEF guidance involved the interpretation of rules for the tagging of ‘mandatory’ tags (found in ANNEX II in the RTS). This interpretation stems from the fact that a ‘Validation Warning’ is given when a ‘mandatory’ tag is missing.
If the report did not contain the information needed, there were 2 options used by preparers across Europe.
ESMA has now, thankfully, cleared this up by removing all forms of interpretation and stating that if the information is not present it should not be tagged. ESMA has clearly stated in its ESEF reporting manual that
“The RTS on ESEF requires that issuers shall mark up all disclosures that correspond to the elements in Table 1 and Table 2 of Annex II if those disclosures are present in the issuer’s financial statement. If those disclosures are not present in the issuer’s financial statement, they should not be tagged.”
In conclusion, it has been a welcome update to the Reporting Manual which has cleared up many of the questions left from submissions year to date. We will keep you up to date with all updates in our ESEF and UKSEF Knowledge Centre on LinkedIn.
Following on from our previous blog on ESEF’s comparability issues with the anchoring and extension...
Learn moreTo kick off our September blog series on the Reporting Manual updates, we’re taking a closer look...
Learn moreFollowing the recent XBRL Europe Conference in Paris where many topics including the European...
Learn moreWant to see first-hand what ARKK can do for your team? Request a demo today and we will be in touch shortly.